HSG264 Asbestos
HSG264 Asbestos: The Survey Guide – A
Summary
On 29th January 2010 the HSE released HSG 264 Asbestos: The Survey Guide. This document expands on and
replaces MDHS 100. This document is aimed at those conducting Surveys, those who commission surveys and those
with specific responsibilities for managing asbestos in accordance with Control of Asbestos Regulations (CAR)
2006.
Main new
features:
Types of Asbestos Survey
The management survey (akin to the Type 2 survey) is
designed to locate, as far as reasonably practicable, the presence and extent of asbestos containing materials
(ACM’s), so that the Duty holder can prepare a plan for the management of asbestos.
- Standard type of
survey
- Types 1 and 2 no
longer applicable
- Normal occupancy /
activities
- Associated routine
and simple maintenance / installations work
- Involve minor
intrusive work e.g. accessing behind fascia and panels or superficial materials.
- Combination of
sampling and presuming ACM's present
- Default
presumption should be avoided, more difficult to manage e.g. lead to unnecessary removal of
non-ACM's
The refurbishment/demolition survey (akin to the Type 3 survey) is
a much more intrusive survey, designed to locate all the ACM’s so they can be removed before the refurbishment
(whether small scale or a large project) or demolition takes place.
-
Includes minor refurbishment
which involve structural or layout changes e.g. removal of partitions, walls
etc.
-
Needed for home improvement
programmes e.g. new kitchens, bathrooms, electrics, plumbing, windows, roof
etc.
-
Does not need to assess
condition of ACM's other than to indicate areas of damage or areas debris may be present apart from
where removal may not take place for more than 3 months – need to assess condition of
ACM's
-
No access areas from previous
survey must be accessed
-
Textured coating: survey should
identify the nature of the substrate and whether textured coating removal will be
required
-
Provides details of specific
areas which should be inspected: Suspended ceiling, partition walls, cavity walls, apertures, floors,
ducts, cladding, debris in boiler room, roof voids, DPC etc.
-
Surveyed area must be fit for
reoccupation – requires thorough visual inspection and reassurance air sampling with disturbance (areas
with significant destruction)
Planning Stage
- Purpose of
survey?
-
Should not accept restrictions
on the surveyor's ability to access such areas. Under the new HSE guidance, the duty holder cannot
simply take advantage of the small print, for example excusing the surveyor from accessing areas above
a certain height, to relieve him of his obligation to locate and manage
asbestos.
The duty holder should provide:
- clear information
on the number of buildings to be inspected
- plans and relevant
reports or surveys on the building design, structure and construction
- information as to
the use of the buildings and any known hazards details of access arrangements to all relevant
areas
- Avoidance of
standard form of disclaimers/caveats, ineffectiveness to protect a negligent
surveyor.
- Should not seek to
escape liability for incompetent performance by reliance on standard form and widely drawn
caveats.
- Should be
adequately prepared for accessing areas such as ceiling voids, lofts, lift shafts, basements or high
ceilings
- Any caveat MUST be
agreed between the duty holder and the surveyor before commencement and documented in the survey
report.
The surveyor should
provide: 
- details of any
caveats (see below)
- confirmation of
any areas not accessed
- insurance
details
- references from
previous work
- names of
surveyors
- timetable of
work
Carrying Out the
Survey
- Detailed
instructions to the surveyor and largely reproduces in expanded form the contents of MDHS 100 and the same
applies in relation to the presentation of results
- New sections on
survey strategy for domestic sector
- Clearer definition
for Strong presumption and presumed (default situation)
- Product ‘location
& use’ section updated
- Greater detail on
conducting refurbishment/demolition surveys
- Should check for
AIB off-cuts
- For cement
products - if bulk analysis is inconclusive (e.g. Chrysotile & Amosite are detected) then water
absorption test should be carried out to determine if AIB or AC
- Contract
monitoring by duty holder e.g. to check accuracy of survey report and against the original tender; plans
are clear and accurate; all rooms and areas have been accessed, sufficient samples taken; any obvious
discrepancies and inconsistencies.
Clarity of
Report
Two more sections on reporting requirements:
- Executive summary
- describe the scope, type and extent of survey and include the summary of identified/presumed ACM’s, no
access areas, ACM’s with high material assessment scores, clear notes on any actions (and
priorities)
- Conclusions and
actions – summarise the rooms/products/items which contain ACM’s and material (or the priority assessment)
to indicate their urgency
Quality Assurance & Quality Control
- New requirement
for non-accredited organisations/surveyors – Should implement an effective quality management system (ISO
9001 as a minimum)
- 5% of all surveys
are re-inspected
- Audit of completed
surveys
- Survey reports
should be checked by an authorised person before issuing to client
Editorial contributed by Mr M Lopacki
NATAS (National Asbestos Training and Accreditation Scheme)
www.natas.co.uk
Return to the top of Asbestos
|